Betting on kabaddi in the UK: where the market is, what it costs, and how to read it

Updated October 2026

Licensed

Available in US

Fast payouts

18+ Only

Kabaddi has been part of the British betting conversation for several seasons now. Yet most searchers reading about it end up with marketing in one hand and a betting slip in the other and not much in between. The pages actually explaining the market — how a raider’s bonus point changes the over/under, what a handicap does to an All Out, why a £1.90 line leaves roughly five pence in the book — are thinner than the promos that point at them. This one is the opposite: it sets out the licensed operators serving Great Britain customers, names what each one covers and how it covers it, runs the arithmetic behind the headline prices, and flags what the marketing language quietly takes away.

Current data: 27 October 2026 · verified against the Gambling Commission’s public register and individual operator terms.

Why responsible gambling comes first

Kabaddi is a fast, high-scoring sport with long raids, sudden turnovers and matches settled by a golden raid. That is the entertainment. From a punting angle, it is also the kind of event where a bettor’s pattern of staking is easy to lose track of — the schedule is dense during the Indian league seasons, the matches are short, and another one starts within the hour.

Every brand on this page holds a Gambling Commission licence for remote betting, and every one of them is a mandatory member of GAMSTOP (the national multi-operator online self-exclusion scheme). That is not a competitive edge. It is the entry floor. What sits above it varies widely.

The framework itself changed on 30 August 2024, when the Commission’s financial vulnerability check came into force under licence condition 3.4.4 and started being applied to remote betting on deposits minus withdrawals exceeding £150 in any rolling 30 days from 28 February 2025. The check is a public-record check — bankruptcies, county court judgments, the kind of record Companies House and similar registers already hold — not an income check and not a credit-reference check. Bettors who cross that threshold can expect to be asked to confirm a few facts about themselves before continuing. The further financial risk assessments that the press calls “affordability checks” are in a staged plan announced on 7 July 2026; no start date is published, and how operators will implement them is still partly in their own hands.

Two other operator-side controls matter here. Deposit limits are an obligation: every licensed operator must offer a gross deposit limit on a fixed time frame, with the first phase live since 31 October 2025 and a second phase postponed to 30 September 2026. There is no state-set ceiling on deposits or losses; the limit is always the customer’s own choice. And credit-card gambling has been banned in Great Britain since 14 April 2020 (LCCP condition 6.1.2) — that ban reaches into e-wallets funded from a credit card. Debit cards and bank-based payments are unaffected.

For the punter who wants the named support services in one place: GamCare runs the National Gambling Helpline, GambleAware signposts treatment, the NHS runs gambling clinics, and Gamblers Anonymous runs open meetings. The point of this section is not alarmism. It is that betting on kabaddi is betting on a sport, with licensed operators, in a country that treats that as a regulated adult activity, and the protective rails are a small print summary any reader should keep in mind.

What a kabaddi betting app actually has to do

A betting app is, functionally, a thin layer over a sportsbook: in one hand a fixture list, in the other a slip. What a good kabaddi app does is shorten the distance between the moment a viewer sees a tactical shift (a third consecutive super raid, a bench player entering for an all-out specialist) and the moment they place a price on it. What a bad one does is the opposite — long load times between markets, settled lines from three raids ago, and a live tab that hides behind three menus.

Among the operators reviewed for this guide, three cover kabaddi in-app rather than only via the desktop site. Spreadex combines fixed-odds and spread betting in one app, with one-click, auto and partial cash out, a Bet Builder that can mix fixed odds and spread positions, and live streaming across UK and Irish horse racing, greyhounds, tennis, NFL and selected football. Midnite’s app opens to in-play events across its sportsbook, an acca builder, popular accas, and price boosts with maximum-stake limits per boost. bet365 — not a subject of this page’s ranking but referenced as a market benchmark — runs a Bet Builder+ that combines markets from one event into a single bet both pre-match and in-play, plus Super Boosts, winnings boosts on selected singles and bet builders, and a daily Bet Boosts feed. The wider pattern is the same: a sportsbook app for the routine markets, an in-play tab for the live ones, and a Bet Builder or same-game multi for tying matches together.

The browser experience is rarely the reason to choose one brand over another, except in one case that matters for kabaddi specifically: an in-play vertical. The Puneri Paltan vs Tamil Thalaivas game is faster to read in-app than on a desktop browser because the in-app tab is one tap away and the price ladder sits next to the live event. Two operators on this list — Smarkets and Fitzwilliam Sports — describe their products primarily as a desktop platform with a mobile companion. That is not a fault, but a bettor who plans to follow kabaddi in-play should expect to see fewer in-play markets on those brands than on Spreadex or bet365.

Touchscreen design, in practice, decides whether an in-play bet is settled at the intended price. Markets update every few seconds during a live match and any lag from a slow connection or a cluttered app screen pushes the price by a tick. That is not the bettor’s friend.

In-play kabaddi and the price of cashing out

Kabaddi lends itself to in-play betting more than most team sports: scores change quickly, raids are short, and a substitution can swing the next three minutes. The product is mature on the mainstream British books — in-play betting on the Pro Kabaddi League and on selected international fixtures is offered by most GB-licensed brands reviewed for this page, and live streams of selected international events sit alongside the in-play tab on a handful. What is not uniform is the depth of the in-play market on each brand.

Midnite surfaces in-play events on its home page. Spreadex streams UK and Irish horse racing, greyhounds, tennis, NFL and selected football live within the app and lists in-play markets across the rest of its sportsbook. bet365 — referenced for benchmark purposes — offers in-play betting and live streaming of events worldwide alongside its Match Live and Live Golf Tracker (the latter is irrelevant for kabaddi but illustrates how many of these tracker features are sport-agnostic rather than kabaddi-specific).

Cash out is the operator’s offer to settle a live bet before the match ends, at a price the slip calculates. Spreadex runs one-click, auto and partial cash out on both fixed-odds and spread positions. Most other brands on this list offer a standard cash out on selected markets, with limits on when the button is active (often the last five minutes of play are locked because the price is too close to settle).

The economics of cash out are honest only if the reader reads them. The cash-out price is the operator’s own take on the live market, with the operator’s margin embedded in it. The bettor who locks in a small profit on a strong raid is paying a small cut to the bookmaker, and the bettor who cashes out a position that would have lost is paying a larger cut. Cash out is most useful when it stops a bad position from getting worse; it is rarely a route to beating the slip. A ladder showing the cash-out value updating tick by tick on the app is what the better books provide, and a static quote is what the worse ones provide. The reader should check the behaviour before they ever press it.

The predictions question — what tips do and don’t deliver

A prediction is an opinion about a future event. There is no published statistical evidence that any publicly available tipster service adds net value across a season of kabaddi betting. A few conditions are worth stating plainly.

The Pro Kabaddi League publishes fixtures, starting line-ups and team-form data on its own channels. A bettor who reads those before a wager and is willing to skip matches where the data is thin is doing the work a tipster sells without paying for it. Vendors selling “today’s tips” or “vivo pro kabaddi betting tips” packages charge for access to what is, on the better books, freely available form data. The same point applies to combined forecasts: the punter who places one double a week has been better served by reading the price and the form than by a paid prediction feed.

Bankroll management matters more than any tip. The flat-stake approach — the same wager on each match, scaled to budget — keeps the bettor in the game through losing runs and gives the prediction, if one is taken, a fair trial. Increasing stake to “chase” a previous loss is the route that breaks bankrolls and is what the responsible-gambling section of any licensed operator’s site addresses directly. Sophisticated staking systems (level stakes, percentage staking, the Kelly criterion) sit on top of the same principle: stake a small fraction of the bank, never stake money the bettor cannot afford to lose.

Strategy, finally, is not a prediction. Reading the price means refusing a bet when the price is wrong, and that single discipline does more for a long-term bankroll than any tip sheet.

Bet types a punter will meet on a kabaddi match

The match winner market — also called the moneyline or 1X2 in sports with a draw — is the headline price on every bookmaker’s kabaddi page. Two teams, one winner, decimal odds such as 1.90 / 1.90 sit at the start of the page. Below them sit the markets that the marketing rarely explains.

The handicap line — most commonly a ±2.5 or ±3.5 points band on the Pro Kabaddi League — gives one team a head start in points before the match starts. If the favourite wins by more than the handicap, the favourite handicap bet wins; if not, the underdog handicap bet wins, even when the favourite wins the match outright. It is what the bookmakers offer when the outright price is too short to make a bet interesting, and a sharp reader treats the line as a way to find a price close to even money on a clearly uneven match. The total points line is the bet on whether the combined score of both teams runs over or under a published number, typically in the high 30s to low 40s for a full Pro Kabaddi match. The raider performance markets — first raid to score, raid points for a named player, total tackle points for a named player — are the kabaddi-specialist markets and sit on the better books.

Each-way bets are a horse-racing convention and they appear on some sportsbooks as a stake-splitting mechanic for outrights (bet on a team to win the league, with a second smaller stake on the team to place). On kabaddi outrights the each-way terms vary by bookmaker and the bettor should check the place terms before staking. Bet Builder / same-game multi lets a bettor combine several markets from one event into a single bet: a match winner plus a total points line plus a first raid to score, for example. The prices multiply but the bookmaker’s margin multiplies across the legs, and that is what the next section calculates.

The fixtures and the competitions: where kabaddi actually runs

The Pro Kabaddi League, founded in 2014, is the franchise league that drives most of the betting volume on the sport. It began with eight teams in its first season and grew to 12 ahead of the 2017 season; today’s season is a 12-team round-robin followed by knockouts. The tournament sits inside an Indian sports ecosystem with its own media rights and its own window on the calendar, which is why the British punter’s access varies by bookmaker and why the schedule is denser in the autumn than the spring.

The international circuit runs around the Pro Kabaddi season: the men’s and women’s Kabaddi World Cup, organised by the International Kabaddi Federation (founded in 2004), the Asian Games kabaddi events when they fall on the cycle, and regional events. Indian men’s and women’s teams have won every edition of the World Cup held to date.

The British bookmaker faces a coverage choice. Bigger brands price a wider fixture list across both the Pro Kabaddi League and the international games, including player performance markets for named raiders and defenders. Smaller and more specialist brands price only the headline matches at outrights and live odds. A punter with a position on a particular raider — say a named defender’s tackle points line — needs a brand whose player markets are deep enough to carry it.

Game rules are mostly identical across competitions, with small tweaks to half-length at international level: 20-minute halves for men and 15-minute halves for women with a five-minute interval, seven players per side on court plus three to five substitutes. Scoring is straightforward: one point per defender tagged plus a bonus point for crossing the bonus line when six or more defenders are on court; an All Out — one team having all seven opponents tackled — adds two extra points on top of the tackle points. A tied match is decided by a tie-breaker of five raids per team and then a golden raid, where the first team to score wins.

A note worth stating once and referring back to: most British bookmakers offering kabaddi are pricing it as a remote general betting standard (real events) licence category, with bespoke market depth rather than a fixed coverage level set by the Gambling Commission. What a brand covers is its own commercial call.

The ten reviewed bookmakers, ranked and costed

The ranking that follows is built on three things the bookmakers themselves publish: the depth of their sportsbook, the breadth of in-play markets they offer on the Pro Kabaddi League and on international events, and the practical economics of each one’s headline sign-up terms (the cost in turnover, in time, and in the punter’s attention to terms-of-use detail). Ten licensed operators for Great Britain customers are reviewed below; the order of the list is the order in which a punter with a fresh account on each should read them.

The first column lists the brand. The second lists the Gambling Commission remote licence number and the licence holder — the named entity on the public register — for verification on the Commission’s register. The third states what the operator’s own terms say on the matters most relevant to a kabaddi bettor: minimum stake, qualifying-bet terms, withdrawal time, in-play coverage.

A scan of the operator-by-operator table above tells a story: every brand holds a Gambling Commission remote licence under its own corporate parent and the licence number is the verifiable test, not the trading brand. The licence holders named — Spreadex Limited, Smarkets (Malta) Limited, Copybet UK Limited, Blue Star Planet Limited, Bet Tom Limited, SBKI Limited, Boylesports Enterprise, SCGO Limited, Octopus Game Limited, Goodwin Racing Limited — are separate corporate entities, even where one parent company owns more than one trading brand within this industry. The Commission public register is searchable by name and by account number.

Spreadex takes the top spot because it combines fixed-odds and spread positions in a single app, with the only spread-betting product reviewed on this list. The combination matters for a kabaddi bettor in two narrow ways: a spread position on total points lets the punter buy or sell the line rather than pick over or under, and the Bet Builder can mix a fixed-odds position with a spread position. The regulatory frame is dual: Spreadex is regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority for spread betting (where losses can exceed the deposit) and by the Gambling Commission for fixed-odds betting. A punter who is unsure about the difference should not stake on a spread market before reading it.

Smarkets sits below by virtue of its narrower sportsbook; the betting exchange is well priced and the deposit and withdrawal rails (instant from £10 to £10,000 by open-bank transfer, withdrawal within 6 hours up to £100,000) are the cleanest in the set, but the user should expect fewer pre-match markets on a given Pro Kabaddi fixture than on a Spreadex or a 10bet. Copybet’s distinct selling point is for British and Irish racing punters rather than kabaddi ones — the Best Odds Guaranteed promise and the SP-first-past-the-post payment on horse racing are racing-specific — and its kabaddi offering is a routine one.

10bet is a mainstream sportsbook for football, tennis and horse racing with Cash out, Bet Builder and Live Streaming in the mix; the kabaddi coverage sits on the wider sportsbook and is unremarkable by sportsbook standards. BetTom’s sign-up is a 50% matched return as a free bet up to £50, with a parallel casino offer, and the terms attaching to the free bet repay close reading. Fitzwilliam Sports is a Dublin bookmaker with capped membership and a “High Stakes Welcome” subject to compliance criteria, which puts it firmly in the small-stakes-not-served-here category; the immediate appeal to a UK kabaddi punter is limited by the membership gate.

BoyleSports, VBet, Octobet and BetGoodwin are variations on the welcome-offer theme: BoyleSports £20 in free bets for a £10 qualifying bet, VBet a £10 free bet if a first bet of £10 or more loses, Octobet 50% back as a free bet up to £50 plus a £10 casino bonus, BetGoodwin £15 in free bets (three £5 bets) for a £10 qualifying stake. The arithmetic of each, in turnover and in qualifying-bet terms, sits in the calculation section that follows.

The veredic sits below each name, on the single thing that distinguishes it from the other nine in its row. Spreadex because the spread product gives the more flexible bettor a route that the conventional books do not. Smarkets because the deposit and withdrawal rails and the exchange’s margin on the bigger fixtures make it the lowest-friction place to back and lay a position. The rest, by their terms.

What this guide is, and what it does not pretend to be

Kabaddi betting in Great Britain is a small market relative to football or horse racing, and that has consequences for both the punter and the operator. A small market means fewer in-depth markets per fixture, which means a Bet Builder or same-game multi on a kabaddi match carries a wider margin than the equivalent builder on a Premier League fixture. A small market also means fewer live streams, more settled games that stay pre-match only, and a longer wait between events during the off-season of the Pro Kabaddi League.

A punter looking at this list for the first time should expect to find one or two brands that suit the way they actually bet and ignore the rest. The brands that match a casual football acca bettor are not the brands that match a specialist kabaddi bettor with named-position wagers; the brands that match a racing-first bettor are not the brands that match an in-play-only bettor. A single list that pretended to suit all of them would be a marketing page, not this one.

What the page does is gather the regulated picture — the licensed operators, the kind of licence each one holds, the regulatory framework in which they operate — and place it beside the practical picture — what each one offers, what each one’s terms mean in pounds, and what the marketing literature leaves out. The rest is the bettor’s own decision.

How the regulatory frame actually works in the UK

The Gambling Commission licenses operators under the Gambling Act 2005. That Act covers Great Britain: England, Scotland and Wales. Northern Ireland runs under older legislation and is outside the Act’s scope; writing that a “GB licence” covers Northern Ireland is wrong, and writing that a “UK licence” is a single thing on the licensing side is just as wrong. The Commission’s public register lists every brand, every licence number and the named licence holder, and the register itself — searchable by name, brand, domain and account number — is the test of who holds a licence.

Two further pieces of post-2014 law shape the field. First, since the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act 2014, an operator whose remote facilities are used in Great Britain needs a Commission licence wherever the operator is based. A Curaçao, Malta or Gibraltar licence is not a substitute for operating into GB. Second, the licence types themselves are not interchangeable. A remote general betting standard (real events) licence covers the bulk of sports betting; a remote general betting standard (virtual events) licence is a separate category for virtual fixtures; a remote general betting limited licence is for lower-volume operators; a remote pool betting licence covers pool betting on horse and dog racing; a remote betting intermediary licence covers exchanges. A punter who cannot find the right category on the register against a brand’s name should not assume the brand is licensed for the activity the punter wants.

The mandatory checks are not negotiable. Since 7 May 2019, every GB-licensed operator has to verify name, address and date of birth before a customer can deposit or gamble — including with a free bet or bonus. Anonymous play is over. Above the £150 net-deposit threshold in a rolling 30 days, the financial vulnerability check can ask additional questions; the press’s “affordability check” is the same family of measures, applied at higher levels and rolled out over a timetable the Commission has not finalised. Tax: a GB punter pays no tax on betting winnings, with the standard caveat that anyone running betting as a business should ask HMRC. General Betting Duty is the operator’s tax, currently 15% on gross profits, with a future-rate change to 25% on remote betting from 1 April 2027 (UK horse racing, self-service betting terminal bets, pool betting and in-person betting stay at 15%); that change affects operators’ economics, not punter tax.

The unlicenced side: an operator without a GB licence that provides facilities to GB customers is committing an offence under section 33 of the Gambling Act 2005. The Commission’s enforcement is disruption, not blocking: cease-and-desist notices, search-engine referrals, registrar and host work, payment-provider work, and a court-order DNS blocking power that is granted or imminent. Customer-side offences against those who merely bet on an unlicensed site were not found. The honest framing is that a licensed operator binds itself to all the protections above — identity check, GAMSTOP, the £150 vulnerability check, the bonus cap, dispute-resolution routes — and an unlicensed operator is bound by none of them. The choice is between the rails and the absence of rails, not between safety and risk in any abstract sense.

Costs in plain numbers: turnover, qualifying bets and the margin

The headline price on a two-way market such as a total-points bet at over/under 39.5 sits at decimal 1.90 / 1.90 on most major books once the line is set. The bookmaker’s margin is the per-unit cut the operator keeps regardless of the result. A two-way market priced at 1.90 / 1.90 has a payout share of roughly 0.526 — that is, 1 ÷ (1/1.90 + 1/1.90) — and a margin of roughly 0.474, which expressed as a percentage sits in the high 40s. That is higher than a 1X2 football margin and higher than a two-way totals margin on a major-market football or basketball match; it reflects the smaller market for kabaddi and the wider spread the operator needs to take risk off the book. Tighten the assumption to 1.95 / 1.95 — the kind of price a sharper book or a betting exchange posts on a headline fixture — and the margin falls into the high single digits to low teens. Across markets and across operators, kabaddi is generally wider than football, narrower than outrights.

The sign-up offers on this page’s brands sit in the £10-to-£50 bracket and are conditional. A £20 in free bets for a £10 qualifying bet (BoyleSports) means the operator takes the £10 stake, returns the £20 in free bets, and the stake is not returned with the free-bet winnings. The implied cost to the operator — and the implied value to the bettor — sits in the single pounds of expected value on the wager after considering the wagering terms. A 50% matched return as a free bet up to £50 (BetTom, Octobet) means a £50 deposit unlocks a £25 free bet at most, with a parallel casino bonus running as a separate product on BetTom; the wagering conditions on each brand’s offer are the terms to read before staking the qualifying deposit.

The voucher-code culture is rooted in marketing, not in what a punter is offered. Several operators publish offers in-app and on the website without a code, and the operator’s terms are the operative document. Code-redemption channels are an affiliate mechanism and the offers they surface are the same offers. A punter’s better use of time is to read the brand’s terms once than to chase a slightly larger headline across a half-dozen codes.

A quick reference for the punter

Licensed operators for Great Britain customers: ten reviewed, listed in the table above. The Commission’s public register is the test. The licence number is one row of the table and is searchable as such by account number. The licence holder is the named legal entity on the register; the trading brand and the licence holder are not always identical names.

Minimum age, identity check, deposit and loss limits, GAMSTOP enrolment, bonus-cap compliance, complaints route, approved dispute-resolution services: all compulsory under licence for every reviewed brand. The specific terms of any given offer — wagering factor, minimum odds, expiry, capped free-bet winnings, restricted markets — are stated by each operator in its own terms, and the page describes those terms qualitatively; the punter reads them before claiming.

Marketing language around free bets, boosts and “free” credits is what the next paragraph deflates.

Where the marketing meets the arithmetic

“Free bet” sounds free. It is not — the free bet stake is not returned with the winnings. On a £10 free bet at odds 5.00 the punter keeps the winnings (£40) but not the £10, so the effective stake is zero and the punter keeps £40 net. The headline offer of £20 in free bets for a £10 qualifying bet is, after the lost stake, worth less than the £30 headline. The smaller the free-bet stake and the longer the odds, the more that difference matters.

“Risk-free” is the same construction with a different gloss. The risk is on the first bet: if it loses, the operator refunds it as a free bet. The punter’s net position on a £10 “risk-free” bet at odds 2.00 that loses is a £10 free bet whose stake is not returned. The cost of the offer is the price the operator needs to charge on the line to compensate, and that price lives in the margin.

“100% bonus” or “50% back” offers deposit-match or stake-match packages. The wagering factor — the multiple of the bonus the punter must stake before withdrawing — sits in the operator’s terms. The Commission’s 19 January 2026 cap is 10x: a £10 bonus at 50x (£500 of bets) is now illegal; under the cap, no more than £100 of wagering can attach to a £10 bonus. Mixed-product offers — “bet £10 on football to get free spins on the casino” — are banned under the same change.

“Bet builder” or “same-game multi” — combining several markets from one match into a single bet — multiplies the prices but multiplies the margins. On a tightly priced Premier League fixture a five-leg Bet Builder still sits with a margin in the high single digits to low teens; on a smaller-market kabaddi fixture the same construction is wider. The calculation runs the same way: the implied probability of each leg is summed and the difference from 100% is the margin.

“Best odds guaranteed” and “whistle-to-whistle” are racing-specific terms and do not apply to kabaddi. The licensed brands reviewed for this page that publish BOG (Copybet) state it for UK and Irish racing.

Spread betting’s “losses can exceed deposit” is the regulatory warning the FCA requires Spreadex to publish — it is a feature of financial spread products, not a tagline. A punter who does not understand a spread position should not stake on one.

Frequently asked questions

How does a bet on kabaddi work in practice?

A bet on a kabaddi match is a stake against the bookmaker at a published decimal price. If the outcome is settled in the punter’s favour, the return is the stake multiplied by the decimal odds: a £10 stake at 2.50 returns £25, of which £15 is profit and £10 is the stake returned. If the outcome goes against the punter, the stake is lost and nothing is returned. Kabaddi matches settle at the end of normal time unless the operator states otherwise, with extra-time settlement only where the league plays extra time.

What does the punter actually do to place a bet on kabaddi?

A punter starts by registering with a licensed operator, completing the age-and-identity check the Gambling Commission requires (name, address, date of birth, verified before the first deposit), funding the account with a debit card or a bank transfer, and selecting the Pro Kabaddi League or international fixture from the sportsbook. The punter chooses a market — match winner, handicap, total points, named-player performance — enters a stake, confirms the price, and the bet is recorded on the slip. The settlement runs automatically at the end of the match in most cases; named-player markets settle on official competition data.

How can the punter check a bookmaker has a Gambling Commission licence?

The Gambling Commission’s public register is searchable at the Commission’s own site. A punter enters the brand name, the domain, the corporate parent or the licence account number and reads back the entry: the licence type, the licence holder (the corporate entity, not necessarily the trading brand), the address and the licence categories. Every reviewed brand on this page is listed against a real Commission entry, and the licence number in the table above is searchable as a number. A brand not on the register is not licensed.

How is the return on a bet worked out from stake and odds?

The return on a winning single bet is the stake multiplied by the decimal odds: a £10 stake at 2.50 returns £25. The profit is the return minus the stake: £15 in the example. On a combination bet — a double, treble or accumulator (“acca”) — the odds of each leg multiply into one combined price; the return is the stake multiplied by that combined price. Fractional odds of 5/1 convert to decimal 6.00 (5 ÷ 1 + 1), fractional 11/4 to decimal 3.75 (11 ÷ 4 + 1), and “evens” (1/1) to decimal 2.00.

What is the bookmaker’s margin and how does it sit in the price?

The bookmaker’s margin is the percentage of every pound staked that the book keeps on average across a market. On a two-way market priced at 1.90 / 1.90 the per-unit payout share is roughly 1 ÷ (1/1.90 + 1/1.90) — about 1.053, or 52.6% — so the margin is 1 − 0.526, or 47.4%. That is the cut the operator keeps of every pound bet on this market. The same share is visible as a 5% margin if the same two-way market is priced at 1.95 / 1.95 (roughly): the payout share is 1.026, the margin is 0.026. The margin is a property of the market and the operator; it is not stated alongside the price and must be calculated.

How does the punter convert fractional odds 5/1 to decimal 6.00?

Fractional odds 5/1 mean a £1 stake returns £5 profit plus the £1 stake back, so the decimal price is 6.00 (5 ÷ 1 + 1). More generally, fractional a/b converts to decimal a ÷ b + 1. Fractional 11/4 is 11 ÷ 4 + 1 = 3.75. Fractional 4/6 (an odds-on price) is 4 ÷ 6 + 1 = 1.67. The conversion is reversible: decimal 3.00 minus 1 gives 2/1 in fractional; decimal 2.10 minus 1 gives 11/10.

Content created by the «Best betting exchange» team